Three Putt
Rookie
Mclaren is going to impose a development moratorium on three parts of the car that are in question. What does his imply, that there is stolen idea in those three areas?
The FIA Technical Dept report reads that the braking system on the 08 car had been influenced by the receipt of Ferrari information. Also, the report claims the engineers had prepared to use the confidential info to its advantage in developing the 2007 and 2008 cars.
If all they have to do is stop developing, will the parts otherwise be permitted to remain on the car? This sounds to me like a dangerous decision. Imagine if Mclaren are really fast in 2008, which of the other teams will again suggest their car has stolen ideas on it? If they don't have to completely re-design their car to clear it completely, I think they are giving other teams a big target!
All the teams will be running Mclaren-designed ECUs next year as well. It sounds like a recipe for something explosive, if Mclaren's 08 car is fast
Ran out of characters in the original Q. My point is: if Mclaren is allowed to simply stop developing those questionable parts further and do not have to remove them completely from their car, are they not leaving themselves exposed to criticism from other teams?
It would be irrelevant if Mclaren is slow in '08. If their car is dominant, won't that doubt and suspicion be there again? I don't want to see another spy mess in 08.
rosbif, I'd really like to read your comments on this possible scenario.
The FIA Technical Dept report reads that the braking system on the 08 car had been influenced by the receipt of Ferrari information. Also, the report claims the engineers had prepared to use the confidential info to its advantage in developing the 2007 and 2008 cars.
If all they have to do is stop developing, will the parts otherwise be permitted to remain on the car? This sounds to me like a dangerous decision. Imagine if Mclaren are really fast in 2008, which of the other teams will again suggest their car has stolen ideas on it? If they don't have to completely re-design their car to clear it completely, I think they are giving other teams a big target!
All the teams will be running Mclaren-designed ECUs next year as well. It sounds like a recipe for something explosive, if Mclaren's 08 car is fast
Ran out of characters in the original Q. My point is: if Mclaren is allowed to simply stop developing those questionable parts further and do not have to remove them completely from their car, are they not leaving themselves exposed to criticism from other teams?
It would be irrelevant if Mclaren is slow in '08. If their car is dominant, won't that doubt and suspicion be there again? I don't want to see another spy mess in 08.
rosbif, I'd really like to read your comments on this possible scenario.